CVE-2026-42812

Published: Mag 04, 2026 Last Modified: Mag 04, 2026
ExploitDB:
Other exploit source:
Google Dorks:
CRITICAL 9,4
Attack Vector: network
Attack Complexity: low
Privileges Required: low
User Interaction: none
Confidentiality: N/A
Integrity: N/A
Availability: N/A
CRITICAL 9,9
Attack Vector: network
Attack Complexity: low
Privileges Required: low
User Interaction: none
Scope: changed
Confidentiality: high
Integrity: high
Availability: high

Description

AI Translation Available

In Apache Iceberg, the table's metadata files are control files: they tell readers
which data files belong to the table and which table version to read.

`write.metadata.path` is an optional table property that tells Polaris
where to
write those metadata files.
For a table already registered in a
Polaris-managed
catalog, changing only that property through an `ALTER TABLE`-style settings
change (not a row-level `INSERT`, `SELECT`, `UPDATE`, or `DELETE`) bypasses
the commit-time branch that is supposed to revalidate storage locations.

The full persisted / credential-vending variant requires the affected
catalog
to have `polaris.config.allow.unstructured.table.location=true`, with
`allowedLocations` broad enough to include the attacker-chosen target.

`allowedLocations` is the admin-configured allowlist of storage paths that
the
catalog is allowed to use. Public project materials suggest that this flag
is a
real supported compatibility / layout mode, not just a contrived lab-only
prerequisite.

In that configuration, a user who can change table settings can cause Apache Polaris
itself to write new table metadata to an attacker-chosen reachable storage
location before the intended location-validation branch runs.

If the later concrete-path validation also accepts that location, Polaris
persists the resulting metadata path into stored table state. Later
table-load
and credential APIs can then return temporary cloud-storage credentials for
the
same location without revalidating it. In plain terms, Polaris can later
hand
out temporary storage access for the same attacker-chosen area.

That attacker-chosen area does not need to be limited to the poisoned
table's
own files. If it is a broader storage prefix, another table's prefix, or,
depending on configuration or provider behavior, even a bucket/container
root,
the resulting disclosure or corruption scope can extend to any data and
metadata Polaris can reach there.

The practical consequences are therefore similar to the staged-create
credential-vending issue already discussed: data and metadata reachable in
that
storage scope can be exposed and, if write-capable credentials are later
issued, modified, corrupted, or removed. Even before that later credential
step, Polaris itself performs the metadata write to the unchecked location.

So the core issue is not only later credential vending.

The primary defect
is
that Polaris skips its intended location checks before performing a
security-
sensitive metadata write when only `write.metadata.path` changes.

When `polaris.config.allow.unstructured.table.location=false`, current code
review suggests the later `updateTableLike(...)` validation usually rejects
out-of-tree metadata locations before the unsafe path is persisted. That may
reduce the persisted / credential-vending variant, but it does not prevent
the
underlying defect: Polaris still skips the intended pre-write location check
when only `write.metadata.path` changes.

20

Improper Input Validation

Stable
Common Consequences
Security Scopes Affected:
Availability Confidentiality Integrity
Potential Impacts:
Dos: Crash, Exit, Or Restart Dos: Resource Consumption (Cpu) Dos: Resource Consumption (Memory) Read Memory Read Files Or Directories Modify Memory Execute Unauthorized Code Or Commands
Applicable Platforms
Technologies: AI/ML
View CWE Details
284

Improper Access Control

Incomplete
Common Consequences
Security Scopes Affected:
Other
Potential Impacts:
Varies By Context
Applicable Platforms
Technologies: ICS/OT, Not Technology-Specific, Web Based
View CWE Details
732

Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource

Draft
Common Consequences
Security Scopes Affected:
Confidentiality Access Control Integrity Other
Potential Impacts:
Read Application Data Read Files Or Directories Gain Privileges Or Assume Identity Modify Application Data Other
Applicable Platforms
Technologies: Cloud Computing, Not Technology-Specific
View CWE Details
863

Incorrect Authorization

Incomplete
Common Consequences
Security Scopes Affected:
Confidentiality Integrity Access Control Availability
Potential Impacts:
Read Application Data Read Files Or Directories Modify Application Data Modify Files Or Directories Gain Privileges Or Assume Identity Bypass Protection Mechanism Execute Unauthorized Code Or Commands Dos: Crash, Exit, Or Restart Dos: Resource Consumption (Cpu) Dos: Resource Consumption (Memory) Dos: Resource Consumption (Other)
Applicable Platforms
Technologies: Database Server, Not Technology-Specific, Web Server
View CWE Details
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/02/13
https://lists.apache.org/thread/wxd2wj3p0smvrk84msv317wg5tp3jtw9