CVE-2026-65625

Published: Ott 26, 2026 Last Modified: Ott 27, 2026
ExploitDB:
Other exploit source:
Google Dorks:
MEDIUM 5,9
Source: 6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db
Attack Vector: local
Attack Complexity: low
Privileges Required: none
User Interaction: none
Confidentiality: N/A
Integrity: N/A
Availability: N/A

Description

The pure-Erlang AES-GCM fallback in jose_jwa_aes derives the number of verified authentication tag bits from the attacker-supplied tag itself. In the {aes_gcm, Bits} clause of block_decrypt/4, the incoming tag is guarded only by is_binary/1, with no check on its length. Verification in gcm_block_decrypt/6 then computes TBits = bit_size(T) and compares only those bits of the real 128-bit tag. An attacker who controls a JWE token can truncate the authentication tag to as little as 8 bits, so only 8 bits are ever checked. This reduces forgery resistance from 2^-128 to 2^-8, and a forged ciphertext is reliably accepted as authentic within 256 attempts without knowledge of the key (an authentication tag forgery and integrity bypass). Supplying a tag longer than 128 bits instead causes a badmatch that crashes the decrypting process. The fallback is reached through the public JWE decryption path whenever AES-GCM is not provided by a native crypto NIF, for example on FIPS or stripped or older OTP builds.

This issue affects jose: from 1.2.0 before 1.11.13.

354

Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value

Draft
Common Consequences
Security Scopes Affected:
Integrity Other Non-Repudiation
Potential Impacts:
Modify Application Data Other Hide Activities
Applicable Platforms
All platforms may be affected
View CWE Details
https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-65625.html
https://github.com/potatosalad/erlang-jose/commit/3fa1f8e3efda0da5ce6f4c9984789…
https://github.com/potatosalad/erlang-jose/commit/8848b172575fb7d7e1e2977e8ae0a…
https://github.com/potatosalad/erlang-jose/security/advisories/GHSA-6gxw-6f7r-c…
https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-65625